Stefan Fries (1), Sebastian Schmid (1), Manfred Hofer (1)
(1) University of Mannheim, Germany
Abstract, Value orientations are believed to influence learning in school. We assume that this influence is mediated by the
valences attached to specific school subjects. In a questionnaire study (704 students from 36 classes) achievement and well-being
value orientations were measured. Students also rated valence scales for the school subjects German and Mathematics and reported
their respective grades. In order to take into consideration the nested data structure, the mediation hypotheses were tested using
the Hierarchical Linear Model in a series of intercept only models. School grades were significantly predicted by value orientation.
A mediation analysis indicated that this relation was completely mediated by the valences of the different school subjects.
Les orientations valeurs sont supposées influencer l'apprentissage. Nous croyons que cette influence est médiate par les valences
des disciplines scolaires. Dans un sondage (704 étudiants de 36 classes) les orientations des valeurs de réussite et de bien-être ont
été mesurées. En outre, les étudiants ont indiqué leur valence pour les disciplines d'allemand et de mathématique et communiqué leurs
notes respectives. Pour tenir compte de la structure imbriquée des dates, les hypothèses médiatiques ont été analysées en utilisant
le Modèle Hiérarchique Linéaire avec des models intercept-only. Les notes ont été prédites de façon significative par les orientations
valeur. L'analyse de médiation indique une dépendance strictement médiate par les valences des différentes disciplines scolaires.
Key words: Academic achievement, Hierarchical linear model, Mediation analysis, Valence, Value orientation.
References
Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic,
and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
Boehnke, K. (2005). Value orientations in relation to mathematical self-esteem: An exploratory study of their role in mathematical
achievement among German, Israeli, and Canadian 14-year-olds. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20, 227-241.
Boekaerts, M. (2003). Adolescence in Dutch culture: A self-regulation perspective. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Adolescence and
education: International perspectives on adolescence and education (vol. 3, pp. 101-124). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Bollen, K., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110,
305-314.
Brendl, C.M., & Higgins, E.T. (1996). Principles of judging valence: What makes events positive or negative? In M.P. Zanna (Ed.),
Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 28, pp. 95-160). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Bubeck, M., & Bilsky, W. (2004). Value structure at an early age. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 63, 31-41.
Cantor, N. (1994). Life task problem solving: Situational affordances and personal needs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
20, 235-243.
Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, New York: University of Rochester Press.
Eccles, J.S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132.
Fazio, R.H. (2001). On the automatic activation of associated evaluations: An overview. Cognition and Emotion, 15, 115-141.
Feather, N.T. (1988). Values, valences, and course enrollment: Testing the role of personal values within an expectancy-valence
framework. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 381-391.
Feather, N.T. (1990). Bridging the gap between values and actions: Recent applications of the expectancy-value model. In E.T. Higgins
& R.M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (vol. 2, pp. 151-192), New York:
Guilford Press.
Feather, N.T. (1995). Values, valences, and choice: The influence of values on the perceived attractiveness and choice of alternatives.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1135-1151.
Feather, N.T. (1999). Values, achievement, and justice: Studies in the psychology of deservingness. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
Fries, S., Schmid, S., Dietz, F., & Hofer, M. (2005). Conflicting values and their impact on learning. European Journal of Psychology
of Education, 20, 259-273.
Graham, J.W., Cumsille, P.E., & Ekek-Fisk, E. (2003). Methods for handling missing data. In J.A. Schinka & W.F. Velicer (Eds.),
Methods in Psychology (pp. 87-114). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Greenfield, P.M., Keller, H., Fuligni, A., & Maynard, A. (2003). Cultural pathways through universal development. Annual Review of
Psychology, 54, 461-490.
Himmelfarb, S. (1993). The measurement of attitudes. In A.H. Eagly & S. Chaiken (Eds.), The psychology of attitudes (pp. 23-87).
Forth Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Hitlin, S., & Piliavin, J.A. (2004). Values: Reviving a dormant concept. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 359-393.
Hofer, M., & Peetsma, T. (2005). Societal values and school motivation. Students goals in different life domains. Introduction to the
special issue. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20, 203-208.
Hofer, M., Schmid, S., Fries, S., Dietz, F., Clausen, M., & Reinders, H. (2007). Individual values, motivational conflicts, and
learning for school. Learning and Instruction, 17, 17-28.
Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Inglehart, R., & Baker, W.E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological
Review, 65, 19-51.
Kenny, D.A., Kashy, D.A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Hrsg.),
Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., vol. 1, pp. 233-265). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Kenny, D.A., Korchmaros, J.D., & Bolger, N. (2003). Lower level mediation in multilevel models. Psychological Methods, 8, 115-128.
Kessels, U. (2005). Fitting into the stereotype: How gender-stereotyped perceptions of prototypic peers relate to liking of school
subjects. European Journal of Psychology of Edcuation, 20, 309-323.
Krull, J.L., & MacKinnon, D.P. (2001). Multilevel modeling of individual and group level mediated effects. Multivariate Behavioral
Research, 26, 249-277.
Lens, W., Lacante, M., Vansteenkiste, M., & Herrera, D. (2005). Study persistence and academic achievement as a function of the type
of competing motivational tendencies. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20, 275-287.
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers by Kurt Lewin (D. Cartwright, Ed.). New York: Harper &
Row.
Maio, G.R., & Olson, J.M. (2000). What is a "value-expressive" attitude? In G.R. Maio & J.M. Olson (Eds.), Why we evaluate: Functions
of attitudes (pp. 249-269). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Maio, G.R., Olson, J.M., Bernard, M.M., & Luke, M.A. (2003). Ideologies, values, attitudes, and behavior. In J. DeLamater (Eds.),
Handbook of social psychology (pp. 283-308). New York: Plenum.
Marini, M.M. (2000). Social norms and values. In E.F. Borgatta & R.J.V. Montgomery (Eds.), Encyclopedia of sociology (pp. 2828-2840).
New York: Macmillan.
Oviada, S. (2003). Suggestions of the postmodern self: Value changes in American high school students, 1976-1996. Sociological
Perspectives, 46, 239-256.
Pansu, P., Bressoux, P., & Louche, C. (2003). Theory of the social norm of internality applied to education and organizations. In N.
Dubois (Ed.), A social cognitive approach to social norms (pp. 195-230). London: Routledge.
Raudenbush, S.W., & Bryk, A.S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage.
Raudenbush, S.W., Bryk, A.S., Cheong, Y.F., & Cogdon, R.T. (2000). HLM 5: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood,
IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
Rubin, D.B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: Wiley.
Schiefele, U. (1999). Interest and learning from text. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 257-280.
Schmid, S., Hofer, M., Dietz, F., Reinders, H., & Fries, S. (2005). Value orientations and everyday action conflicts: An interview
study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20, 243-258.
Schwartz, S.H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical test in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.),
Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 25, S. 1-65). New York: Academic Press.
Schwartz, S.H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M., & Owens, V. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the
theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 519-542.
Seligman, C., Olson, J.M., & Zanna, M.P. (Eds.) (1996). The psychology of values: The Ontario Symposium (vol. 8). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Shafer, J.L. (1999). NORM: Multiple imputation of incomplete multivariate data under a normal model, version 2 [Computer Software for
Windows 95/98/NT]. Retrieved January 12, 2005 from http://www.stat.psu.edu/~jls/misoftwa.html.
Sobel, M.E. (1982). Amsymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.),
Sociological methodology (pp. 290-312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Streiner, D.L. (2003). Being inconsistent about consistency: When coefficient alpha does and doesn't matter. Journal of Personality
Assessment, 80, 217-222.
Urdan, T. (Ed.). (1999). Advances in motivation and achievement: The role of context (vol. 11). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
Verplanken, B., & Holland, R.W. (2002). Motivated decision making: Effects of activation and self-centrality of values on choices and
behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 434-447.
Weber, M. (1949). Max Weber on the methodology of the social sciences (E.A. Shils & H.A. Finch, Eds. & Trans.). New York: Free Press.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81.
|