Sebastian Schmid (1), Manfred Hofer (1), Franziska Dietz (1), Heinz Reinders (1), Stefan Fries (1)
(1) University of Mannheim, Germany
Received: June 2004 Revision received: December 2004
Abstract, The assumption that today’s German students are able to successfully combine synthesis achievement values and well-being values appears to be overly optimistic when regarded from the perspective of motivational psychology. The results of a qualitativequantitative interview study with 25 students indicate that achievement and well-being values may come into conflict in everyday life. Incentives for achievement and well-being rarely co-occur in the same action domains. Whereas the school context is dominated by achievement incentives, leisure time is dominated by well-being incentives. Since both achievement and well-being are appreciated by most students, they should be prone to experience frequent everyday action conflicts. The motivational characteristics of postdecisional action conflicts are described on the phenomenal level and their possible impairing effects for learning processes are pointed out. Finally, alternative forms of value synthesis, which might be realized more successfully, are discussed.
Supposer que les étudiants allemands d’aujourd’hui sont capable de bien réussir à combiner des valeurs de puissance et des valeurs de bien-être dans une sorte de synthèse de valeurs, semble trop optimiste en regardant d´une perspective de la psychologie motivationnel. Les résultats d’une investigation d’interview avec 25 étudiants indiquent que les valeurs de la puissance et du bien-être peuvent être au conflit dans la vie quotidienne. Les attraits pour la puissance et le bien-être ne paraissent pas aux mêmes domaines d’activité. Le domaine d’école est dominé des attraits de la puissance, tandis que les loisirs sont dominés des attraits du bien-être. Comme la majorité des étudiants apprécient toutes les deux valeurs, la puissance et le bien-être, ils devraient pencher à avoir des conflicts quotidiens. Les caractéristiques motivationnelles de conflits de l’action, après avoir pris la décision, sont décrit sur le niveau phénoménal et leurs effets apparemment entravé sur le procédé d’apprentissage sont indiqué. Finalement, des alternatives de la synthèse de valeur, qui pourraient être réalisé plus prospérée, étaient discutés.
Key words: Achievement, Conflict, Incentives, Values, Well-being.
References
Boekaerts, M. (2003). Adolescence in Dutch culture: A self-regulation perspective. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Adolescence and education, Volume III: International perspectives on adolescence and education (pp. 101-124). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.
Deutsche Shell (Ed.). (2000). Jugend 2000 [Adolescence 2000]. Opladen: Leske+Budrich.
Deutsche Shell (Ed.). (2002). Jugend 2002 [Adolescence 2002]. Frankfurt: Fischer.
Dörner, D., & Stäudel, T. (1990). Emotion und Kognition [Emotion and cognition]. In Scherer, K.R. (Eds.), Psychologie der emotionen (pp. 293-344). Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, Vol. C/IV/3. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Eccles, J.S., & Barber, B.L. (1999). Student council, volunteering, basketball, or marching band: What kind of extracurricular involvement matters? Journal of Adolescent Research, 14, 10-43.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, Ill: Row Peterson.
Fleiss, J.L. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 378-82.
Fries, S., Dietz, F., & Schmid, S. (submitted). Motivational interference: The impact of nonchosen activities on mood and performance.
Fries, S., Schmid, S., Dietz, F., & Hofer, M. (2005). Conflicting values and their impact on learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, XX(3), 259-273.
Gensicke, T. (2002). Individualität und Sicherheit in neuer Synthese? Wertorientierungen und gesellschaftliche Aktivität [Individuality and security in a new synthesis? Value orientations and civic activity]. In Deutsche Shell (Ed.), Jugend 2002 (pp. 139-212). Frankfurt: Fischer.
Gollwitzer, P.M. (1990). Action phases and mind-sets. In E.T. Higgins & R.M. Sorrentino (Eds.), The handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (vol. 2, pp. 53-92). New York: Guilford Press.
Goschke, T. (1997). Zur Funktionsanalyse des Willens: Integration kognitions-, motivations- und neuropsychologischer Perspektiven [On the functional architecture of volitional action: Integration of cognitive, motivational, and neuropsychological perspectives]. Psychologische Beiträge, 39, 375-412.
Greeno, J.G. (1989). Situations, mental models and generative knowledge. In D. Klahr & K. Kotovsky (Eds.), Complex information processing: The impact of Herbert A. Simon (pp. 285-318). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Heckhausen, H. (1974). Leistung und Chancengleichheit [Achievement and equality of opportunity]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Hofer, M. (2004). Schüler wollen für die Schule lernen, aber auch anderes tun. Theorien der Lernmotivation in der Pädagogischen Psychologie [Students want to learn for school, but they want to do other things as well: Theories on learning motivation in Educational Psychology]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 18, 79-92.
Hofer, M., Fries, S., Reinders, H., Clausen, M., Dietz, F., & Schmid, S. (in press). Individuelle Werte, Handlungskonflikte und schulische Lernmotivation [Individual values, action conflicts, and learning motivation]. In J. Doll & M. Prenzel (Eds.), Bildungsqualität von Schule: Lehrerprofessionalisierung, Unterrichtsentwicklung und Schülerförderung als Strategien der Qualitätsverbesserung (pp. 329-344). Münster: Waxmann.
Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Jones, E.E., & Gerard, H.B. (1967). Foundations of social psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Kuhl, J. (1983). Motivation, Konflikt und Handlungskontrolle [Motivation, conflict, and action control]. Berlin: Springer.
Lienert, G.A., & Krauth, J. (1975). Configuration frequency analysis as a statistical tool for defining types. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 35, 231-238.
Mann, M. (1970). The social cohesion of liberal democracy. American Sociological Review, 35, 423-31.
Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und techniken (7th ed.). Weinheim: Deutscher studien Verlag 2000[Qualitative content analysis: Foundations and techniques].
Miller, D. (1999). Principles of social justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Minsky, M. (1990). The society of mind. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Noelle-Neumann, E., & Petersen, T. (2001). Zeitenwende. Der Wertewandel 30 jahre später [Turn of an era: Value change 30 years later]. Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 29, 15-22.
Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Peetsma, T.T. (2000). Future time perspective as a predictor of school investment. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 44, 177-192.
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R.P. (2002). Academic emotions in student’s self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91-105.
Perels, F., Schmitz, B., & Bruder, R. (2003). Trainingsprogramm zur Förderung der Selbstregulationskompetenz von Schülern der achten Gymnasialklasse [A training program for the promotion of self regulation competencies of gymnasium students in eighth grade]. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 31, 23-37.
Reinders, H., & Hofer, M. (2003). Wertewandel, schulische Lernmotivation und das duale Jugendmoratorium [Value change, motivation to learn, and types of adolescent moratorium]. In H. Reinders & E. Wild (Eds.), Jugendzeit – Time Out? Zur Ausgestaltung des Jugendalters als Moratorium. Opladen: Leske+Budrich.
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
Rubinstein, J.S., Meyer, D.E., & Evans, J.E. (2001). Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 763-797.
Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141-166.
Schwarz, N. (1990). Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In R.M. Sorrentino & E.T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (vol. 2, pp. 527-561). New York: Guilford Press.
van Deth, J. (2001). Wertewandel im internationalen Vergleich: Ein deutscher Sonderweg? [Value change in international comparison: A German sonderweg?]. Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 29, 23-30.
von Eye, A. (1990). Introduction to configural frequency analysis: The search for types and antitypes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wegner, D.M., & Vallacher, R.R. (1986). Action identification. In R.M. Sorrentino & E.T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (vol. 1, pp. 550-582). New York: Guilford.
Wentzel, K.R. (2002). The contribution of social goal setting to children’s school adjustment. In A. Wigfield & J.S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 221-240). San Diego: Academic Press.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81.
|